To MFA, or not to MFA?

I have a Masters of Fine Arts degree in Creative Writing from Sarah Lawrence College. I loved Sarah Lawrence. The Professors truly helped me improve and explore as a writer. I used my degree to start down a career path I find fulfilling. I am very glad I worked towards the degree. However I do not think an MFA is necessarily for most writers.

One of the reasons many writers should not get it is the cost. MFA’s can be prohibitively expensive. Some are available on scholarship, some even involve a stipend and offer teaching experience, most do not. They can put you into debt without necessarily giving you a degree that will help you get out of debt. That doesn’t mean you shouldn’t get an MFA because of the debt that may or not be involved, but that you should enter it into your equation as a writer, because if you have to work that off, you might have even less time to write. Which does not seem worth it to me. Time spent writing, editing, etc, is invaluable, and sometimes that is the most important thing that people take away from the MFA program, so if you can create that time for yourself without the program, and make sure that it is a profitable time in terms of writing, then that should be an option to consider.

Getting an MFA does not guarantee that you will continue writing. Some people I know went into the MFA program thinking it would turn them into someone who writes, outside of the program. In fact the opposite is true, often. Approximately 3 out of 5 people with a MFA degree in creative writing, will stop writing within 5 years of receiving there degree. Those are not good odds. I think that happens because the MFA creates an artificial environment in which you have time to write and also motivation to do so.

It depends a great deal on what you plan to do with an MFA. If you plan to try to publish fiction and non fiction it might help. As a poet I don’t even include it in most of author bios. Not because I am not proud of it, but because I believe my publication list is much more helpful to the editor considering my work. It does  allow you to teach. If you want to write and be a professor in college, there is no reason not to pursue an MFA, in my opinion. It also might help you get a job at a literary magazine, but it is not necessary.

Some of the best writers I know do not have an MFA. The most influential professors I had in grad school did not have MFA’s. If you are a good writer, who has a good community around you already, and don’t have any desire to teach, there are very few reasons for you to pursue an MFA.

However if you are a writer who thrives off challenges (as I do), want to teach at the university level, or really feel like you are in need of a good writing mentor, they are worth considering.

Posted in Publishing, Teaching, Writing | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Places to Write: Brooklyn (III)

In case you missed earlier posts, I have written about writing in coffee shops in Brooklyn twice before, here and here. However due to strange luck two more excellent coffee shops have been discovered within walking distance of our apartment since I last wrote about working at coffee shops.

Forty-Weight

492 6th Ave (between 13th St & 12th St)

Forty-Weight coffee is a cafe located in a restaurant called Sweetwolf. The two separate businesses have an arrangement so that the cafe is open seven days a week from 7 till 3:30, then the restaurant is open at night. At first this seemed confusing to me, but it actually works really well in practice. The restaurant also serves lunch in the afternoons at the cafe, every day but Monday. However that is very low key. More people just have a coffee or a pastry. The diners and the lap top workers are all seated in the same area, often on the same table because the cafe is dominated by two pleasant communal tables.  The restaurant has a wood burning oven, that is on all afternoon, so if your sitting in the back of the cafe, you get a nice fire to look at. The front of the cafe is all windows and flooded with light. The whole place is well decorated and very peaceful. The coffee is amazing. It isn’t cheep though. French press is 2.25 per cup, and the amazing pour over is 3$’s and up. But both are worth every penny, because the beans are always exceptional. Forty-Weight is primarily a small batch roasting company (nine pounds at a time) in Ithaca, NY. This is the only cafe location but they sell to other coffee shops and bars. One of the partners in the business roasts the beans and the other (Matt) runs the shop. Everyone who works here is friendly and wonderful, not to name names or anything. I noticed glancing over the Yelp reviews that everyone praises the people who work here, and with good reason. Not only are they great at making coffee but they are some of the nicest people you will ever meet in New York.

Steeplechase Coffee Shop

3013 Fort Hamilton Pkwy (between 3rd St & 2nd St)

Steeplechase is in Windsor Terrace, Brooklyn. It is on a busy street, but the front windows let in lots of light, and there is another small window near the back. No real views, but lots of light. It also has two comfy chairs that are well positioned in terms of light. Lot’s of tables too. It never seems to get too packed.  The french press coffee I had was not worth writing home about. It is a nice quite place to work.

 

 

 

 

Posted in Places to Write | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Excercise and Practice

There are a lot of writing exercise out there. However unlike physical exercise which I am addicted to, I have always struggled with using writing exercises on a daily basis. Or even a yearly basis.  Until recently when my good friend, Fawaz Al-Matrouk a very gifted screenwriter (and film maker) told me about an exercise he had started to do on a daily basis. One that he had found extremely helpful. It has quickly become a part of my daily routine, something I do even on the days where I do not really have time to write.

The exercise as I understand it, works as follows. You do some arm stretches. Then you write a title for your piece. Your title should work as a prompt. I usually write something fairly concrete, for example, Dark Island, West Coast Cabin, Light in the Storm. Nothing too original. You then set the timer for 3 minutes, press play, and type as quickly as you possibly can. The object of this very fast typing is quantity, not quality. So far the most words I have managed to type in three minutes is 166. But most days I manage to improve on my number. Although right now I seem to consistently miss reaching the hoped for 167. Most times the writing I have produced is not even worth reading over, but sometimes there are some good ideas contained within. However the way the exercise has helped me the most so far is thinking and writing quicker. It has allowed me to come up with ideas that otherwise would have never occurred to me.

I have done it now for three weeks. I seem to be improving my typing speed by an average of ten extra words every week.

Posted in Writing | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Man Convicted of Killing Wife Second Time

I started reading Peter Pereira last year. His books are well written and organized, but I must honestly confess that due to personal bias, I am most attracted to his poems about language. Even though he is so well known as a doctor poet, those poems compel me, but not as much as his explorations of language and grammar. Many poets right now are preoccupied with similar themes, but they focus on playing on language without getting to the true ideas or the essence of what is going on. “Man Convicted of Killing Wife Second Time” is particularly striking because of how open to interpretation most headlines are. It also struck me as important because of how general much of the language used in non fiction about crime, is.

“Man Convicted of Killing Wife Second Time”

The Seattle Times, April 2, 2002

 

What fractured syntax! And hard to say

which is worse: that he’d hack her to pieces

in the bathtub as the children slept,

or that then years later he’s convinced enough

of his innocence, to drag himself to trail again.

 

Either way the mother of these kids

is still gripping a lily, her name bolded

across headlines, killed all over again –

 

hatchet wounds fresh as the crime scene photographs

of blood blotting the suburban rambler’s hallway.

 

Calm and contrite, he resembles a parish priest,

not the tough Vietnam vet from whose temper

she once cowered. And it’s almost Shakespearean

now, the way he wrings his hands, as if enough

conviction could somehow wash them clean.

 

 

By Peter Pereira from his book, What’s Written on The Body

Posted in Favorite Poems | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Practice

I have been reading a good (if uneven) book entitled  Talent is Overrated, which is actually less about talent and more about practice, which is something that is very important to me as a writer. I feel like practice is something that was not emphasized in grad school or in the writing groups. Which may be one of the reasons that so many people get an MFA and then within five years, stop writing. However enough about that. I am instead going to write a little bit about the helpful things I learned in Talent is Overrated and how I have been applying these ideas.

First off, Talent of Overrated is by Geoff Colvin, who is primarily a business writer/editor. This is not a book I would have picked off the shelf. However Jacob bought it, and talked about it, and by the time I finished it, I had unofficially renamed it the Art Of Practice, which is definitely a book I would pick off the shelf. The book talks about what makes experts and world class performers great, using specific examples. The examples are always interesting. The conclusions Colvin draws from them are often wrong. However he focuses a lot on specifics, which means that you, as the reader can draw your own conclusion from them.

The most important idea I came out of the book with was that practice should be specific. That the top athletes and musicians don’t just practice, or play pieces that they are good at. They actually focus in practice on the things that they are not great at. As a poet, often practice for me has been writing, and allowing myself to write poems that are sometimes atrocious as a warm up, or intensely editing a poem that is close to good, but not quite there yet.  But after reading the book I’ve started to challenge myself by writing in form, something I have always been scared of. Right now I am focusing on writing Sestina’s. I AM not very good yet, but I am improving. At first I kept getting bogged down in the strange math like elements in Sestina’s, but since I discovered the Sestina Builder. It figures out all the practical stuff, giving me the opportunity to really focusing on improving the writing.

Also I am devoting time, to just practicing, not even technically writing every day. Per the books suggestion I am keeping track of this time, monitoring to see how much work I am actually putting into improving my craft.

 

Posted in Writing | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Print &/Versus Online

Print journals have been around for a very long time, you can submit to journals that are going into their sixth decade, and have published many famous poets, dead and alive. Online journals are clearly a much more recent establishment. Blackbird, one of the first online literary journals that stayed the course, just celebrated their 11th anniversary.  There are advantages and disadvantages that are associated with both forms of publishing. Below I will offer my personal opinion.

Print Journals

Advantages

– Generally more established. Really helps your overall reputation as a writer. The most established, respected journals are all currently print.

– Often you get a free contributor’s copy. A free journal is always nice.

– You get to see your work in print. Sometimes well bound with a nice cover. A thoroughly wonderful experience. It can then go on a shelf with all your other printed work. An occasional ego boost.

– They are more likely to pay. Though usually not much.

Disadvantages

– Less people read your work. This is more a theory then something I can concretely prove, and some journals do have a very large circulation, and a large group of consistent readers. But others do not. Also some publications (I am not naming names) publish almost as much as they can fit, poorly, into one book. I had a hard time finding my own poem on that occasion. People generally seem more open to reading poems for free, online, then seeking them out or subscribing to journals. All the feedback I have received from readers that I didn’t know has been regarding poems that were published online.

– Sometimes you have to pay for copies with no contributor discount and no complimentary copy. I do not agree with this.

– They often have a slower response time.

– Sometimes you have to wait a year or more to see your work in print.

Online Journals

Advantages

– Sometimes they have a large readership.

– Easy to share with friends and acquaintances. Easy to link to on your website.

– The websites can have audio and visual options that are not as easy for print journals to offer.

– Online journals often have a faster response time.

– Your work is sometimes put online within the week, or within a few months. You don’t have to wait too long to see your work.

Disadvantages

– Most online journals are not taken as seriously as print journals.

– You don’t really know how many new people are reading your work. Your own friends could just be reading it. If that.

– Once a piece is printed online you have fewer options open to you in terms of getting a journal to reprint it.

In Conclusion:

These are pretty general statements because when you go too far into the specifics there are often exceptions. I have submitted my work extensively to both. For a while last year I  submitted only to print journals, however rewarding that was, after a while I missed the accessibility and visibility of online publications, so now I am once again submitting to both.

 

 

Posted in Publishing | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Class

One of the best experiences I have had this year is teaching a poetry class. I have been an English professor for over a year now, and while I have managed to sneak  poetry in to most of my classes, I have never had the opportunity to teach an entire class before.

My own experience with poetry as an undergraduate was not a very good one. I was already writing, both poetry and prose, quite seriously. I read poetry fairly often, but in a very undisciplined, anthology friendly way. So I entered the class fairly confident that an introductory course in poetry would not overwhelm. On the first day the teacher informed us that the first time she read poetry for fun was when she was assigned this course. I was shocked that she even phrased it that way, if she was already assigned the course how could it be for fun? She inadvertently reversed the unstressed and stressed syllables when explaining Iambs and Trochees. She spent two three hour classes teaching us that the Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock was not something anyone was capable of understanding. The most modern poem she taught us was the Fish by Elizabeth Bishop. The list goes on.

The school I received my undergraduate degree from is very different from the school I now teach at. The University of Toronto is a very established, extremely competitive, large institution, that generally focused on humanities. Berkley (not the one in California) where I teach now, is a small business college. Students get degrees in Criminal Justice, and Fashion Marketing. I really like teaching there in large part because of the students. In the poetry class I taught (the last day is today) I had students who read poetry for their own amusement and enjoyed writing poems. I also had students who had never really read a poem before, they were taking my class only because they needed an elective to graduate and mine happened to fit into their schedule. Both groups of students and the class as a whole has taught me many lessons.

The most important lesson was that the poets and poems you are taught about in graduate school are not the ones that impact peoples live outside of the poetry community. The first assignment I gave my students was to bring in a poem of their choice to share with the class. I got a great deal of Langston Hughes, Edgar Allen Poe, Robert Frost, and Maya Angelou. When the students gave presentation on poet’s, five people gave there presentation on Poe, four on Angelou. I am admitting now that while I read Poe as a child, the first time I heard one of Angelou’s poems it was in my class, being read by one of my students. Phenomenal Women is a poem that empowers, it doesn’t have the sophistication of line breaks that appeals so much to teachers and students, but it is raw in a way that connects with individuals. It would be mocked in many of my graduate classes, yet it has had much more impact on humanity then Jack Gilbert or John Ashberys poems.

As a graduate student in workshop you don’t often talk about the importance of the idea in a poem, but for my students, that is often the most valuable thing. I think as a writer, a reader, and a teacher, that is a lesson I will carry with me for a long time. I learned that I also value the idea, although I prefer it to be less transparent, I love and remember it best when a poet like Auden or Yeats combines great thoughts with imagery and language, to make it alive. That is the balance I am seeking more in my work now, thanks in part to my students.

Posted in Favorite Writers, Teaching, Writing | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Victims Of Ted Bundy: The Chapbook

The chapbooks are officially for sale here! I could not be more excited. They just arrived in the mail on Monday.

You should go here and buy one! Or send the link to someone who might be interested.

If you are on the fence, you can read several of the poems that were published by the new and terrific Menacing Hedge Literary Magazine.

Posted in Publishing, Victims of Ted Bundy, Writing | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Places to Write: Brooklyn, Part II

There are some new  wonderful coffee shops in Brooklyn (Park Slope to be specific) and an old one rediscovered.

Konditori

186 Fifth Avenue (Next to Sackett/Berkley Place)

The first Brooklyn location of Konditori (there is also one in Manhatten on the lower east side, but I’ve never been), opened in January. It took us a while to discover it as a place for writing and work, because it always looked so busy. However once we started coming here, we discovered it’s the kind of place where if you don’t mind squeezing, you will fit. Also the wonderful employees and owners, as well as fellow customers will make it as easy as possible for you to find a place. The people who work at Konditori, and those who run it are very friendly and kind. It is open till eight at night, which is definitely a bonus.  It has great light and is a wonderful work environment. I particularly like working at the large, shared, front table. They are very laptop friendly, have free reliable wi-fi, and an Ipad that anyone can use on the main table. They also have a typewriter on the wall in a box The coffee is good, particularly the Swedish roast and the cappuccinos. Also after 3, almond croissants are 1$ and bagels are 50 cents. Both are delicious. I also really like the honey camomile cookie. They also subscribe to the New York Times.

Konditori

240 7th Avenue

Run by the same people as the one on fifth, this location opened less then ten days ago. It is much like the first in terms of decor, a big table, little tables, exposed brick, rough wood, light. It is however much bigger then the first location, which is nice. There is a lot more space, a lot less squeezing, and it does not have the same slightly claustrophobic feel most places in New York have (including our apartment). They even have a semi private, but open to the public, back room. It has the same good coffee, food, etc, just with more space. I can think of few places that are better to work, or write.

Cafe Regular (Du Nord)
158 Berkeley Pl (between 6th Ave & 7th Ave)

One of the cutest places to write. Cafe Regular is beautiful inside, with great decorations, paintings, and a wonderful ceiling. It also has internet access. However it is small, and while the window seats look very cute, there are only two of them and they are not terribly comfortable to sit in for a longer period of time. None of the other seating is very functional. The coffee is good though, the beans are exceptional and they offer discounts for teachers (how nice!) and Coop members (although you can’t combine, otherwise I would get 15% off, instead of just 10%). The employee’s are the tipping point, they are some of the least friendly people I have ever met. On several occasions, even when it is busy, I have caught one employee listening to his headphones.

Posted in Places to Write, Writing | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

On Research

As an undergraduate I studied history and classical civilizations. I focused on roman culture and the World Wars. I did not like researching particularly. Although It was something I found myself doing frequently. Of course as a voracious reader I would often find myself wandering down strange rabbit holes. Even the indexes of books could be dangerous for me. I did well on papers, but it was something that I never thought would become part of my career as a writer. For one I was still leaning towards fiction back then, and I never thought of research as something a writer did, outside of non-fiction of course.

When I signed up for Stephen O’Connors class at Sarah Lawrence on Creative Writing and Research I did not expect to learn anything particularly new. I had a short story on the brain, about a family that found one of Bundy’s victims while hiking on Thanksgiving (partially true), and I thought that Stephen O’Connors class would help motivate me to complete it. I never did. Stephen O’Connor taught a wonderful class, I learned so much about research. Not research in terms of reading, but in terms of doing, of getting out there, experiencing. But even more so I learned about how to let that research effect my writing. The research and I had a relationship, a balance, so that when it led me away from the hikers that I could find out little about and to the victims, I knew to follow. Stephen O’Connor taught me that. He also taught me how to edit, to keep things sparse.

One of the most important things about researching and writing is to not let the research overwhelm. Many times it is tempting to keep researching. To research far more then you could ever use. To focus on little facts or details till you say them in your sleep. This does not help you write. What you have to do is have clear goals, clear areas of interest. The other issue that can arise while researching is the discovery of something that is related tangentially to your subject, that is very interesting, but actually distracts from the over all point, or story that your telling. You have to wise, and exclude these facts. Include only what is vital, or what helps the overall story you are telling. Try focusing on what you want to do, not what you don’t want to do.

Posted in Victims of Ted Bundy, Writing | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment